내가 문장 의미를 오인해서 답변 해석이 맞는줄 알았네;;

And somewhat relieved by this idea, I ventured once more to meet my master’s and lover’s eye, which also sought mine, though I averted* both face and gaze. He smiled, and I thought his smile was such as a sultan* might, in a blissful and fond moment, bestow* on a slave his gold and gems had enriched.*

“You don’t need to look at me like that,” I said. “If you do, I’ll wear nothing but my old Lowood frocks* until I die. I’ll be married in this lilac* gingham.*”

나는 생각했다/그의 미소가 술탄의 힘과 같다고/축복받고 행복한 순간에/(여기가 이해 안되는데)노예에게 그의 금과 보석을 헌정했을때

bestow on an slave his gold and gems had enriched

여기가 이해 안되는데

구문 분석해 보면

I thought/ his smile/ was/ such as a sultan might/, in a blissful and fond moment,/ bestow/ on a slave/ his gold and gems.

나는 생각했다/그의 미소가/술탄이/더 없이 행복한 순간에/그의 노예에게 그의 금과 보석을 헌정했을때와 같은

즉 his gold and gems이 bestow의 목적어잖아

such as a sultan might, in a blissful and fond moment, bestow on a slave (his gold and gems had enriched).

전 질문 글에서 답변 봤을때 문장 구조가 이렇게 된줄 알았는데 근데 이러면

bestow의 직접 목적어가 없는거잖아 노예에게 뭘 줬는지가 없으니 말이 안되고

그럼 had enrich의 주어가 없는 셈인데 이러면 비문 아닌가