moment of their lives, moment in their lives 여기서는 in이 적절했지만 이 문장에서는 for가 적절해보여서 for를 사용함ㅋㅋㅋ
I protected the house of robots, which were fixed by me. I protected the house for robots, which were fixed by me. which is better?
ChatGPT
The choice between the two sentences depends on the intended meaning:
"I protected the house of robots, which were fixed by me."
This implies that the house belongs to the robots and that you fixed the robots.
"I protected the house for robots, which were fixed by me."
This implies that you protected the house on behalf of the robots and that you fixed the robots.
If you want to convey that the house belongs to the robots, go with the first sentence. If you want to convey that you protected the house for the benefit of the robots, go with the second sentence. Both sentences are grammatically correct.
I protected the house for robots, which were fixed by me. I protected the house for robots which were fixed by me. which is better?
ChatGPT
Both sentences are grammatically correct, but the first sentence is clearer and more standard in usage. Here it is for reference:
"I protected the house for robots, which were fixed by me."
Including the comma before "which" helps to indicate that the clause "which were fixed by me" is additional information about the robots. The second sentence without the comma is also correct but less commonly used in this context.
I protected the house for robots, which were fixed by me. I protected the house for robots that were fixed by me. which is better?
ChatGPT
The second sentence is better for clarity and correctness:
"I protected the house for robots that were fixed by me."
Using "that" instead of "which" makes the sentence more concise and directly connects the clause to the robots you fixed.
댓글 영역
획득법
① NFT 발행
작성한 게시물을 NFT로 발행하면 일주일 동안 사용할 수 있습니다. (최초 1회)
② NFT 구매
다른 이용자의 NFT를 구매하면 한 달 동안 사용할 수 있습니다. (구매 시마다 갱신)
사용법
디시콘에서지갑연결시 바로 사용 가능합니다.