(Banks가 영국 신문에 기고하기 시작했고 그중 low-status 여성에 대한 연구-여러 하층민들의 종류를 열거한 후). Each series was based on her own stint on the job, undertaken on false pretenses. 매 시리즈는(혹은 일련의 것-하층여성?) 그녀의 직업의 제한에 기본했다? 위장에 실패한 언더테이큰? ㅅㅂㅂ.... Ethical dilemmas were not always occasioned by loyalties to women. He spilled some secrets whose publication would allegedly have damaged US interests. Ultimately, Banks decided he had talked to her as a woman, not a reporter. This time Banks lied, telling her editor that the diplomat had refused to say anything. 마지막 문장은 비교적 쉬운것 같기도 한데, 편집장이 뱅크를 외교관 인터뷰에 (아마도 여자라서)보낸 후 돌아와서의 상황이에효. 영어가 하도 짧아서 해석이 안되네효........................... 아래는 마지막 고비 ㄳ Many journalist-autobiographers recalled being asked to withhold either information or an entire story, in order to protect someone, often a woman the journalist construed as already victimized. Again, they all expressed some conflict over this - because they knew that acting as a woman required a certain sacrifice to their personal sense of professionalism and to their public reputation. For journalists, news is about people in power or about public life and institutions; so the audiences that count are powerful people.